> JuCodex
JuCodex is a Chinese-market AI relay specializing in coding models, reselling access to OpenAI's Codex and GPT-4 variants. It features a custom ratio system for billing and provides a small initial credit for new accounts to test compatibility with IDE extensions.
// pros
- New-API based, OpenAI-compatible, has /v1/* and a key-generating console, programmatically callable
- 6-RMB signup trial credit, relatively low ratios
- Focuses on gpt-5.6-sol/terra/luna for Codex/coding tools
// cons
- Free is a one-off 6-RMB credit with almost no free models (only 1 free entry in /api/pricing)
- Essentially a coding/Codex-reselling paid relay, not a 'free LLM API' product
- QQ-email-only registration, anonymous operator, no corporate entity
- Same-category Codex relays have 'officially absconded, 1000+ team accounts lost' cases; high funds/stability risk
- version=v0.0.0, /v1/models requires auth
A coding/Codex-reselling paid relay with only a one-off 6-RMB credit; does not match the free LLM API focus, and same-category absconding cases make it high-risk. Not recommended to rely on; if trialing, avoid large deposits.
community_reputation
CSDN describes jucodex releasing the gpt-5.6 series with a 6-RMB signup credit; Linux.do discussions focus on calling its models in Codex, plus a negative case of a same-category Codex relay 'officially absconding'. A coding-reselling paid relay with negligible free quota.
imported analysis — independent third party, not Uprouter editorial · verify before relying on it
How we estimated this: the free allowance is converted to a dollar value using the provider’s own pay-as-you-go rates for the models a typical developer would reach for. When the allowance is metered in requests, tokens or minutes rather than dollars, we assume median usage of the cheapest capable model. Because assumptions are involved, the figure carries the est. flag — treat it as an order of magnitude, not a quote.
note: One-off new-user credit: 6 RMB (≈$0.89) on signup (QQ-email only), ratios as low as 0.15; only 1 free entry in /api/pricing, no sustained free quota, essentially pay-as-you-go.
| Plan | Type | Monthly | Input /1M | Output /1M | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free tier (source-reported) | free | — | — | — | One-off new-user credit: 6 RMB (≈$0.89) on signup (QQ-email only), ratios as low as 0.15; only 1 free entry in /api/pricing, no sustained free quota, essentially pay-as-you-go. |
| Signup Credit | free | — | — | — | 6 RMB (~$0.89) initial credit for new users. |
Pricing normalized from public sources — always verify with the provider.
// model prices
| Model | Input /1M | Output /1M | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| gpt-image-2 | — | — | — |
$ Does JuCodex have a free tier?
Yes — JuCodex offers a free tier that we value at roughly $0.89 in free credits (estimate — derived from rate-limited usage at pay-as-you-go prices). Always confirm current limits on JuCodex's official pricing page — free tiers change without notice.
$ How much does JuCodex cost per 1M tokens?
JuCodex does not publish simple per-1M-token pricing (it may bill per request, per output, or via a subscription plan). Check their official pricing page for exact figures.
$ Is JuCodex safe to use?
Uprouter rates JuCodex as high risk. Rated high risk. Limited or no official documentation, an opaque or anonymous operator, unstable availability, or pricing and terms that could not be independently confirmed. Relays of this kind may resell shared upstream credits or forward prompts through intermediate hops, so data-handling guarantees are weak. Risk ratings are editorial, evidence-based, and never influenced by affiliate relationships.
Raw community sentiment, shown unblended. Votes never feed into objective data fields like price, risk, or status — and never into sort order.
No published reviews yet — be the first.
// more_informationprice history · live status · risk & confidence · code snippets
price_history
No recorded changes yet.
live_status
full history →best-effort probes · not a guarantee · last 1d ago
| Checked | Status | Latency |
|---|---|---|
| 1d ago | up | 709ms |
| 2d ago | up | 840ms |
| 4d ago | up | 660ms |
| 5d ago | up | 1018ms |
| 7d ago | up | 681ms |
| 8d ago | up | 692ms |
| 10d ago | up | 679ms |
| 12d ago | up | 758ms |
| 13d ago | up | 673ms |
| 14d ago | up | 702ms |
| 14d ago | up | 611ms |
| 15d ago | up | 665ms |
| 16d ago | up | 625ms |
| 17d ago | up | 687ms |
| 17d ago | up | 722ms |
| 18d ago | up | 762ms |
| 19d ago | up | 727ms |
| 20d ago | up | 644ms |
| 20d ago | up | 645ms |
| 21d ago | up | 643ms |
| 22d ago | up | 631ms |
| 23d ago | up | 716ms |
| 24d ago | up | 672ms |
| 25d ago | up | 620ms |
| 25d ago | up | 693ms |
| 26d ago | up | 633ms |
| 27d ago | up | 634ms |
| 28d ago | up | 622ms |
| 29d ago | up | 650ms |
| 29d ago | up | 623ms |
Uprouter runs its own probes; best-effort, not a guarantee. Probe results depend on our network location and cadence — for production, always use the provider’s own status page.
risk_&_confidence
Rated high risk. Limited or no official documentation, an opaque or anonymous operator, unstable availability, or pricing and terms that could not be independently confirmed. Relays of this kind may resell shared upstream credits or forward prompts through intermediate hops, so data-handling guarantees are weak.
Confidence reflects how much verifiable evidence (official docs, probe history, community reports) backs this entry. Risk is our editorial assessment of operator reliability and terms — not financial advice.
code_snippets
# JuCodex's own API — get a key from their dashboard
curl https://YOUR-PROVIDER-ENDPOINT/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer THEIR_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "gpt-image-2",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Hello" }]
}'Direct to the provider — Uprouter receives nothing; verify their current pricing before purchasing.
Ranked by neutral similarity signals only — live status, free-tier shape and free-credit proximity. Commercial relationships never influence this list.