> IAMHC
IAMHC (Xinjiang Huancheng Wangan) is a public-welfare AI API gateway providing unified access to over 199 mainstream models. It features a rate-limited free tier and emphasizes compliance with built-in moderation for developers in the China region.
// pros
- One API key calls 199+ mainstream models, OpenAI-compatible, works with Claude Code/Cursor/Cline/Codex CLI
- Discloses corporate ICP filings (e.g., 冀ICP备2022012838号) — more transparent than anonymous sites
- Claims domestic-compliant models only, built-in moderation, rejects gray/black-market use
- Third-party test (Veridrop) rated its glm-4.7 85/100 'pass'
// cons
- Free tier is small-parameter only with strict rate limits (~1000+ calls per 5 hours) — test-only
- Full/advanced models require payment (pub/VIP/SVIP)
- /v1/models requires auth (401); specific free model names not fully transparent
- Still a relay: verify whether advertised advanced models are swapped and whether data is logged
Classify as free-relay, medium risk. Corporate filing and third-party testing are pluses; the free tier is continuous but strictly rate-limited and only fit for light testing; avoid large deposits and confidential data.
community_reputation
Neutral-to-positive: third-party tutorials (Huancheng Notes) describe its free public-welfare gateway and compliance filing; Veridrop's relay test rated glm-4.7 'pass' (85/100); yet it remains subject to generic relay risks and the free tier is strictly rate-limited.
imported analysis — independent third party, not Uprouter editorial · verify before relying on it
How we estimated this: the free allowance is converted to a dollar value using the provider’s own pay-as-you-go rates for the models a typical developer would reach for. When the allowance is metered in requests, tokens or minutes rather than dollars, we assume median usage of the cheapest capable model. Because assumptions are involved, the figure carries the est. flag — treat it as an order of magnitude, not a quote.
note: Free tier: small-parameter models only, ~1500 calls per 5h (some sources say ~800), unguaranteed and test-only; paid pub/VIP/SVIP tiers. Rough ≈$5/mo equivalent; reliability low.
| Plan | Type | Monthly | Input /1M | Output /1M | Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Free tier (source-reported) | free | — | — | — | The free tier uses small-parameter models, strictly rate-limited to ~1500 calls per 5 hours (some sources say ~800), unguaranteed, test-only; paid tiers are pub/VIP/SVIP. Free quota is continuous but limited in capability. |
| Free Tier | free | — | — | — | Strictly rate-limited access to test models. |
Pricing normalized from public sources — always verify with the provider.
// model prices
$ Does IAMHC have a free tier?
Yes — IAMHC offers a free tier that we value at roughly $5.00 in free credits (estimate — derived from rate-limited usage at pay-as-you-go prices). Always confirm current limits on IAMHC's official pricing page — free tiers change without notice.
$ How much does IAMHC cost per 1M tokens?
IAMHC does not publish simple per-1M-token pricing (it may bill per request, per output, or via a subscription plan). Check their official pricing page for exact figures.
$ Is IAMHC safe to use?
Uprouter rates IAMHC as medium risk. Rated medium risk. a free relay that forwards to an upstream with only partial transparency: some model coverage or pricing is confirmed, while other figures rest on third-party reports or a login-gated console. Risk ratings are editorial, evidence-based, and never influenced by affiliate relationships.
Raw community sentiment, shown unblended. Votes never feed into objective data fields like price, risk, or status — and never into sort order.
No published reviews yet — be the first.
// more_informationprice history · live status · risk & confidence · code snippets
price_history
No recorded changes yet.
live_status
full history →best-effort probes · not a guarantee · last 1d ago
| Checked | Status | Latency |
|---|---|---|
| 1d ago | up | 2044ms |
| 3d ago | up | 1447ms |
| 4d ago | up | 2364ms |
| 6d ago | down | 6001ms |
| 7d ago | up | 2069ms |
| 9d ago | up | 4599ms |
| 10d ago | up | 2242ms |
| 12d ago | up | 2093ms |
| 13d ago | up | 1385ms |
| 14d ago | up | 4447ms |
| 15d ago | up | 1448ms |
| 15d ago | up | 1360ms |
| 16d ago | up | 2069ms |
| 17d ago | up | 4316ms |
| 18d ago | up | 2250ms |
| 18d ago | up | 2944ms |
| 19d ago | up | 2156ms |
| 20d ago | up | 2185ms |
| 21d ago | up | 1428ms |
| 21d ago | up | 2250ms |
| 22d ago | down | 6003ms |
| 23d ago | up | 2740ms |
| 24d ago | up | 5107ms |
| 25d ago | down | 6001ms |
| 26d ago | down | 6001ms |
| 26d ago | down | 6002ms |
| 27d ago | up | 2253ms |
| 28d ago | up | 1982ms |
| 29d ago | up | 2015ms |
| 29d ago | up | 2321ms |
Uprouter runs its own probes; best-effort, not a guarantee. Probe results depend on our network location and cadence — for production, always use the provider’s own status page.
risk_&_confidence
Rated medium risk. a free relay that forwards to an upstream with only partial transparency: some model coverage or pricing is confirmed, while other figures rest on third-party reports or a login-gated console.
Confidence reflects how much verifiable evidence (official docs, probe history, community reports) backs this entry. Risk is our editorial assessment of operator reliability and terms — not financial advice.
code_snippets
# IAMHC's own API — get a key from their dashboard
curl https://YOUR-PROVIDER-ENDPOINT/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer THEIR_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "free-tier-small-parameter-test-models-specific-names-not-individually-disclosed",
"messages": [{ "role": "user", "content": "Hello" }]
}'Direct to the provider — Uprouter receives nothing; verify their current pricing before purchasing.
Ranked by neutral similarity signals only — live status, free-tier shape and free-credit proximity. Commercial relationships never influence this list.